Openstack Foundation

User Group Newsletter – January 2018

Openstack Foundation Blog - Tue, 16/01/2018 - 10:50
Welcome to 2018!

 

Important Vancouver Summit Updates

The countdown is on until the next Summit in May. Below are some important updates regarding CFP, Travel and Summit Passes

  • CFP is now open!

Call for presentations are now open for the Vancouver Summit. The deadline to submit your proposal is February 8th.

There are some new changes to the structure of the CFP, such as track organisation. Read more here. 

  • Summit Passes and Hotels

These sold quick in 2015 when we last went to Vancouver, don’t miss out and secure yours today. You can do so here

  • Visas

For information regarding Visa applications and invitation letters, read about it here.

As a general planning guideline, if a visa is needed, a foreign traveler should apply for his or her visa as soon as possible, preferably no later than 60 days before the travel date.

  • Travel Support Program

The Travel Support Program (TSP) aims to facilitate participation of key contributors to the OpenStack Summit by covering the costs for their travel and accommodations. The grants will cover a combination of flights, accommodation, and access pass to the Summit. More details here.

All contributors to OpenStack (developers, documentation writers, organizers of user groups around the world, Ask moderators, speakers, translators, etc) are invited to submit a request. You can apply by filling out this form.

  • More Questions?

Got any other questions about the Summit? There is an excellent FAQ here

Ops Meetup Tokyo

The next OpenStack Ops Meetup is happening March 6-7 in Tokyo.

Register here.

Information from Wiki

Project Teams Gathering (PTG)

The Project Teams Gathering (PTG) in Dublin February 26 – March 2. It’s an event for anyone who self-identifies as a member in a specific given project team as well as operators who are specialists on a given project and willing to spend their time giving feedback on their use case and contributing their usage experience to the project team.

Upcoming Industry Events

FODSEM

The Foundation will be present at FODSEM in Brussels, February 3-4 2018.

OpenStack booth will be in building K, level 1

https://fosdem.org/2018

OpenStack delivers a keynote at Chaosscon

Feb 2, 2018 in Brussels

http://grimoirelab.github.io/con/

Upcoming CFP

LF Open Source Leadership

Closing date: January 21, 2018

OSCON 2018

Closing Date: January 30, 2018

LinuxCon ContainerCon | CloudOpen China

Closing Date: March 4, 2018

ONS Europe

Closing Date: June 24, 2018

OpenStack Technical Committee E-office Hours

The TC has e-office hours each week to field any questions you may have.

Find out more details here:
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/

Categories: Openstack Foundation

Developer Mailing List Digest January 5-12th

Openstack Foundation Blog - Fri, 12/01/2018 - 20:34
Success Bot Says
  • e0ne on #openstack-horizon [0]: amotoki runs horizon with django 2.0
  • tristianC on #rdo [1]: review.rdoproject.org is now running sf-2.7
  • mriedem on #openstack-nova [2]: nova merged alternate hosts support for server build
  • mriedem on #openstack-nova [3]: After a week of problems, finally got a volume multiattach test run to actually attach a volume to two instances without melting the world. \o/
  • Tell us yours in OpenStack IRC channels using the command “#success <comment>”
[0] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-horizon/%23openstack-horizon.2017-12-18.log.html [1] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23rdo/%23rdo.2017-12-21.log.html [2] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2017-12-22.log.html [3] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2018-01-05.log.html [4] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23tripleo/%23tripleo.2018-01-09.log.html Community Summaries
  • Technical Committee Status update [0]
  • POST /api-sig/news [1]
  • Release countdown [2]
  • Nova placement resource provider update [3]
  • Keystone team update [4]
  • Nova Notification Update [5]
  • TC report [6]
[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126178.html [1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126147.html [2] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/125996.html [3] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126179.html [4] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126188.html [5] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126025.html [6] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126082.html Community Goals for Rocky So far one goal has been proposed by Kendall Nelson for migrating to Storyboard. It was agreed to postpone the goal until the S cycle, as it could take longer than six months to achieve. There is a good backlog of goals [0], just no champions. It’ll be bad for momentum if we have a cycle with no community wide goal. [0] – https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126090.html PTG Post-lunch Presentations Feedback received from past PTG session(s) was the lack of situational awareness and missed opportunity for “global” communication at the event. In Dublin we’d used the end of the lunch break to for communications that could be interesting to OpenStack upstream developers and project team members. The idea is not to find a presentation for everyday, but if we find content that is generally useful. Interesting topics include general guidance to make the most of the PTG weeks (good Monday content), development tricks, code review etiquette, new library features you should adopt, lightning talks (good Friday content). We’d like to keep the slot under 20 minutes. If you have ideas please fill out this etherpad [0] in a few weeks. [0] – https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/dublin-PTG-postlunch Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-January/126102.html
Categories: Openstack Foundation

User Group Newsletter December 2017

Openstack Foundation Blog - Wed, 20/12/2017 - 13:51

Summit recap

With 2300+ attendees and 54 countries represented, it was a fantastic week in Sydney. Thank you to all who attended!

You can catch all the action from the Keynotes here. The Summit talk videos are live, find them here. Superuser also covered the Summit with an awesome article covering 50 things you need to know.

Next Summit

Our next Summit destination is in Vancouver. Registration and Hotel booking are now available. Last time we went to Canada, these sold out quick. Don’t miss out and secure yours today.

Congratulations to SuperUser award winners!

On the final day of the Sydney Summit, the Community Contributor Awards gave a special tip of the hat to those who might not know how much they are valued. Read more about the ceremony here.  

Stay tuned to Superuser and OpenStack’s social channels for when nominations open for Vancouver.

2018 CFP dates

Cloud Native Con/KubeCon Europe

Closing date: January 12, 2018

ONS 2018

Closing date: January 14, 2018

LF Open Source Leadership

Closing date: January 21, 2018

OSCON 2018

Closing Date: January 30, 2018

LinuxCon ContainerCon | CloudOpen China

Closing Date: March 4, 2018

ONS Europe

Closing Date: June 24, 2018

Superuser articles of interest

Some fantastic Superuser articles have been published in recent weeks. They include tutorials, information about a new working group and project updates.

Making your first contact with OpenStack

Check out these OpenStack project updates

Working together: OpenStack and Kubernetes

Travel grants support global community to attend OpenStack Summit

How to use OpenStack Glance Image Import

Launch of Kata Containers

The Foundation is excited to announce Kata Containers. This project unites the security advantages of virtual machines with the speed and manageability of containers for running container management tools directly on bare metal without sacrificing workload isolation. Kata Containers delivers increased performance, faster boot time and cost efficiencies. Kata Containers will have its own governance, community and communication channels.

To find out more and get involved:
Sign up for Kata Containers updates at katacontainers.io

Get involved on the Kata Containers Mailing List, Slack* and IRC* (#kata-dev)

Follow Kata Containers on Twitter: @katacontainers

HPC book update

The Scientific Working Group has updated the Crossroads of Cloud and HPC: OpenStack for Scientific Research. Version 2 of the popular book details multiple enhancements made to OpenStack for HPC workloads over the past year and added several new in-depth case studies on how OpenStack supports radio astronomy, bioinformatics, cancer and genome research and more. Read or order the book at https://www.openstack.org/science/ to find out exactly how OpenStack allows researchers to spend less time managing infrastructure and more time on research that matters. To learn more or get involved in the Scientific Working Group, visit https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Scientific_SIG

THANK YOU!

It has been a fantastic 2017!!! Thank you to all community members for your industrious efforts and contributions! Wish you all a Happy Holiday break and a great New Year.

 

Categories: Openstack Foundation

Developer Mailing List Digest December 9-15th

Openstack Foundation Blog - Sat, 16/12/2017 - 19:48
Success Bot Says
  • mordred on #openstack-sdks: “Finished the shade transition to pure REST away from client libs” [0]
  • Tell us yours in OpenStack IRC channels using the command “#success <comment>”
[0] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-sdks/%23openstack-sdks.2017-12-04.log.html Community Summaries
  • TC report 50 [0]
  • POST /api-sig/news [1]
  • Release countdown [2]
  • Technical Committee Status Update [3]
  • Resource Providers Update 45 [4]
[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125434.html [1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125605.html [2] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125610.html [3] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125610.html [4] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125643.html Switching to Longer Development Cycles Our self-imposed rhythm no longer matches our natural pace. Our elections, feature freezes feel like they’re around the corner, and due to that, we’re losing time from them, as multiple people have stated. The pace was designed around more people contributing full time to OpenStack, but lately, we have composite jobs, or were participating in multiple communities (which is great!). It means:
  • One OpenStack coordinated release per year.
  • Maintain one stable branch per year.
  • Elect PTLs once a year.
  • One set of community goals per year.
  • One PTG per year.
Any project that still wants to release often can use the cycle-with-intermediary release model [0]. At a minimum, we’ll release once a year. Teams can choose to revive midcycle if they need to meet more than the one PTG each year. We’ll have more time for community-wide goals, so we will have more time to complete or even set more ambitious goals. This doesn’t simplify upgrades. While upgrading every year is incrementally better than being forced to upgrade every 6 months. The real solution is better support for skipping releases. It also doesn’t give us LTS. The cost of maintaining branches is not really due to the number of them in parallel, it’s due to the age of the oldest one. The real solution here is being discussed by the (still forming) LTS SIG. Extending stability periods is per-project at this point, and the proposal has yet to address a coordinated stability period. We’re doing a year because of the way the events are organized. It’s suggested to start for the Rocky release and have the single PTG in 2018 in Dublin. The release team is opening the discussion to the community, and the TC will give a final decision. Various cons were expressed, like this causing a rush to get in code at the end of a release to avoid having to wait an entire year. Projects are also forced to do compatibility support for versioned APIs, config files, etc since projects would be unable to drop compatibility in an intermediate release. Projects like Grenade will have to support the cases of some projects doing intermediate releases, and those doing yearly. For the people that spend 20% of their time contributing to OpenStack, it has been voiced that it takes time to get a feature merged and the current cycle makes it impossible. This longer development cycle could help with allowing more time for those people. Various people expressed that we should be looking at the root cause of helping our part-time contributors, as the length of the cycle is unlikely the cause. People who can only contribute 20% of their time are also likely to deal with rebase conflicts, instead of focusing on their code. Having a year could also impose having intermediate releases so specifications that can have multiple times a year to be approved. If that’s the idea, however, then it’s causing stress on the core team by having to match these precise schedules, in which the proposal was aiming to ease. It was a concern that this more solves the problem of giving more opportunities to people to get their spec/new feature considered. This topic has also been brought up by various times in the past. Someone noted Daniel Berrange’s thread [1] [0] – https://releases.openstack.org/reference/release_models.html#cycle-with-intermediary [1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057614.html Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/thread.html#125473 Zuul Dashboard Available In addition to the Zuul dashboard [0] showing the “Status”, there are additional tabs added. “Jobs” page shows a list of all jobs in the system and their descriptions. The “Builds” page lists the most recent runs. You can query pipeline, job, and project. [0] – http://zuulv3.openstack.org Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125384.html Security SIG Following previous mailing list discussions [0], the Security Project will be changing into a Special Interest Group (SIG). SIGs have shown to be a good match for the activity the group does around a topic or practice that spans around the community of developers, operators, and users. The group will continue to manage and care for the Security Guide, OSSNs, Bandit, Thread Reviews, Syntribos as well as encourage and incubate new security projects. The group will continue to work with the VMT and will keep a Sec-core group for launchpad that can work with the embargoes issues. [0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124053.html Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125607.html Cycle Highlights Reminder As we get closer to Queens-3 and our final RCs, a reminder is given about the new ‘cycle-highlights’ that has been added to deliverable info. Background of why this was added, some PTLs were being pinged multiple times every release cycle by various people like journalists, product manager and other to compile the same information. To mitigate that, we have a way to capture highlights as part of the release. This will give basic information, but not as a complete marketing message. This is done in the openstack/releases repository in the deliverables/queens/$PROJECT.yaml file formatted like so:     cycle-highlights:         – Introduced new service to use the unsed host to mine bitcoin. We have three different places that document activities for three different audiences: Commit messages: Developer documentation Release notes: End-user and deployer documentation Cycle highlights: Journalists, product manager, and others. Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125613.html Community Goals For Rocky Some questions to ask ourselves: What common challenges do we have, and who is willing to drive that community-wide goal (aka champion). A champion is someone who drives a goal but doesn’t commit to writing code necessarily. The champion will communicate with project PTLs about the goal, and make the liaison if needed. The list of ideas for community-wide goals is collected on this etherpad [0]. Propose some ideas now! [0] – http://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125648.html
Categories: Openstack Foundation

Developer Mailing List Digest November 25 to December 1st

Openstack Foundation Blog - Mon, 04/12/2017 - 17:07
News
  • Project Team Gather (PTG) in Dublin registration is live [0]
[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124978.html Community Summaries
  • TC report by Chris Dent [0]
  • Release countdown [1]
  • Technical Committee Status updated [2]
  • POST /api-sig/news [3]
  • Nova notification update [4]
  • Nova placement resource providers update [5]
[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124964.html [1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/125054.html [2] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125099.html [3] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/125071.html [4] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125146.html [5] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-December/125117.html Dublin PTG Format We will continue themes as we did in Denver (Monday-Tuesday), but shorter times like half days. Flexibility is added for other groups to book the remaining available rooms in 90-min slots on-demand driven by the PTG Bot (Wednesday-Friday. Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/thread.html#124898 First Contact SIG A wiki has been created for the group [0]. The group is looking for intersted people being points of contact for newcomers and what specified time zones. Resource links like contributor portal, mentoring wiki, Upstream Institute, outreachy are being collected on the wiki page. A representative from the operators side to chair and represent would be good. [0] – https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/First_Contact_SIG Policy Goal Queens-2 Update Queens-2 coming to a close, we recap our community wide goal for policies [0]. If you want your status changed, contact Lance Bragstad. Use the topic policy-and-docs-in-code for tracking related code changes. Not Started
  • openstack/ceilometer
  • openstack/congress
  • openstack/networking-bgpvpn
  • openstack/networking-midonet
  • openstack/networking-odl
  • openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing
  • openstack/neutron-fwaas
  • openstack/neutron-lib
  • openstack/solum
  • openstack/swift
In Progress
  • openstack/barbican
  • openstack/cinder
  • openstack/cloudkitty
  • openstack/glance
  • openstack/heat
  • openstack/manila
  • openstack/mistral
  • openstack/neutron
  • openstack/panko
  • openstack/python-heatclient
  • openstack/tacker
  • openstack/tricircle
  • openstack/trove
  • openstack/vitrage
  • openstack/watcher
  • openstack/zaqar
Completed
  • openstack/designate
  • openstack/freezer
  • openstack/ironic
  • openstack/keystone
  • openstack/magnum
  • openstack/murano
  • openstack/nova
  • openstack/octavia
  • openstack/sahara
  • openstack/searchlight
  • openstack/senlin
  • openstack/zun
Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/thread.html#124966 Tempest Plugin Split Goal A list of open reviews [0] is available for the Tempest plugin split goal [1]. Not Started
  • Congress
  • ec2-api
  • freezer
  • mistral
  • monasca
  • senlin
  • tacker
  • Telemetry
  • Trove
  • Vitrage
In Progress
  • Cinder
  • Heat
  • Ironic
  • magnum
  • manila
  • Neutron
  • murano
  • networking-l2gw
  • octavia
Completed
  • Barbican
  • CloudKitty
  • Designate
  • Horizon
  • Keystone
  • Kuryr
  • Sahara
  • Solum
  • Tripleo
  • Watcher
  • Winstackers
  • Zaqar
  • Zun
[0] – https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:goal-split-tempest-plugins+status:open [1] – https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/split-tempest-plugins.html
Categories: Openstack Foundation

Developer Mailing List Digest November 18-27

Openstack Foundation Blog - Tue, 28/11/2017 - 00:24
Community Summaries
  • Glance priorities [0]
  • Nova placement resource provider update [1]
  • Keystone Upcoming Deadlines [2]
  • Ironic priorities and subteam reports [3]
  • Keystone office hours [4]
  • Nova notification update [5]
  • Release countdown [6]
  • Technical committee status update [7]
[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124678.html [1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124429.html [2] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124727.html [3] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124731.html [4] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124820.html [5] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124900.html [6] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124882.html [7] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124875.html Self-healing SIG created Adam Spiers announced the formation of a SIG around self-healing. Its scope is to coordinate the use and development of several OpenStack projects which can be combined in various ways to manage OpenStack infrastructure in a policy-driven fashion, reacting to failures and other events by automatically healing and optimising services. Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2017-November/000170.html Proposal for a QA SIG A proposal to to have a co-existing QA special interest group (SIG) that would be a place for downstream efforts to have a common place in collaborating and sharing tests. Example today the OPNFV performs QA on OpenStack releases today and are actively looking for opportunities to share tools and test cases. While a SIG can exist to do some code, the QA team will remain for now since there are around 15 QA projects existing like Tempest and Grenade. Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/thread.html#124662 Improving the Process for Release Marketing Collecting and summarizing “top features” during release time is difficult for both PTL’s and Foundation marketing. A system is now in place for PTL’s to highlight release notes [0]. Foundation marketing will work with the various teams if needed to understand and make things more press friendly. Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/thread.html#124726 [0] – http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/releases/tree/README.rst#n466
Categories: Openstack Foundation

Developer Mailing List Digest November 11-17

Openstack Foundation Blog - Fri, 17/11/2017 - 10:08
Summaries
  • POST /api-sig/news [0]
  • Release countdown for week R-14, November 18-24 [1]

[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124633.html
[1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124631.html

 

Upstream Long Term Support Releases

The Sydney Summit had a very well attended and productive session [0] about to go about keeping a selection of past releases available and maintained for long term support (LTS).

In the past the community has asked for people who are interested in old branches being maintained for a long time to join the Stable Maintenance team with the premise that if the stable team grew, it could support more branches for longer periods. This has been repeated for about years and is not working.

This discussion is about allowing collaboration on patches beyond end of life (EOL) and enable whoever steps up to maintain longer lived branches to come up with a set of tests that actually match their needs with tests that would be less likely to bitrot due to changing OS/PYPI substrate. We need to lower expectations of what we’re likely to produce will get more brittle the older the branch gets. Any burden created by taking on more work is absorbed by people doing the work, as does not unduly impact the folks not interested in doing the work.

The idea is to continue the current stable policy more or less as it is. Development teams take responsibility of a couple of stable branches. At some point what we now call an EOL branch, instead of deleting it we would leave it open and establish a new team of people who want to continue to main that branch. It’s anticipated the members of those new teams are coming mostly from users and distributors. Not all branches are going to attract teams to maintain them, and that’s OK.

We will stop tagging these branches so the level of support they provide are understood. Backports and other fixes can be shared, but to consume them, a user will have to build their own packages.

Test jobs will run as they are, and the team that maintain the branch could decide how to deal with them. Fixing the jobs upstream where possible is preferred, but depending on who is maintaining the branch, the level of support they are actually providing and the nature of the breakage, removing individual tests or whole jobs is another option. Using third-party testing came up but is not required.

Policies for the new team being formed to maintain these older branches is being discussed in an etherpad [2].

Some feedback in the room expressed they to start one release a year who’s branch isn’t deleted after a year. Do one release a year and still keep N-2 stable releases around. We still do backports to all open stable branches. Basically do what we’re doing now, but once a year.

Discussion on this suggestion extended to the OpenStack SIG mailing list [1] suggesting that skip-release upgrades are a much better way to deal with upgrade pain than extending cycles. Releasing every year instead of a 6 months means our releases will contain more changes, and the upgrade could become more painful. We should be release often as we can and makes the upgrades less painful so versions can be skipped.

We have so far been able to find people to maintain stable branches for 12-18 months. Keep N-2 branches for annual releases open would mean extending that support period to 2+ years. If we’re going to do that, we need to address how we are going to retain contributors.

When you don’t release often enough, the pressure to get a patch “in” increases. Missing the boat and waiting for another year is not bearable.

[0] – https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SYD-forum-upstream-lts-releases
[1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2017-November/000149.html
[2] – https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/LTS-proposal

Categories: Openstack Foundation

Developer Mailing List Digest October 28th – November 3rd

Openstack Foundation Blog - Sun, 05/11/2017 - 02:57
News
  • Sydney Summit Etherpads [0]
[0] – https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Sydney2017 Summaries
  • Nova Placements Resource Provider Update by Eric Fried [0]
  • Nova Notification Update by Balazs Gibizer [1]
  • Technical Committee Status update by Thierry Carrez [2]
  • Technical Committee Report by Chris Dent [3]
  • Release Countdown by Sean McGinnis [4]
  • POST /api-sig/news by Chris Dent [5]
[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-November/124233.html [1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124079.html [2] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124049.html [3] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124134.html [4] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123799.html [5] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124023.html TC Election Results (continued) Congrats to our 6 newly elected Technical Committee members:
  • Colleen Murphy (cmurphy)
  • Doug Hellmann (dhellmann)
  • Emilien Macchi (emilienm)
  • Jeremy Stanley (fungi)
  • Julia Kreger (TheJulia)
  • Paul Belanger (pabelanger)
Full results are available [0]. The process and results are also available [1]. 420 voted out of 2430 electorate, giving us a 17.28% turn out with a delta of 29.16% [2]. Reasons for the low turnout is hard to tell without knowing who is voting and what their activity is in the community. More people are beginning to understand the point of the TC activities, being more around duties than rights (e.g. stewardship and leadership). People could care a bit less about specific individuals and are less motivated by the vote itself. If the activity of the TC was a lot more conflict and a lot less consensus, people might care about it more. [0] – http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_ce86063991ef8aae [1] – https://governance.openstack.org/election/ [2] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123848.html Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/thread.html#124004 Security SIG Our governance used to only have project teams to recognize activity in OpenStack, so we created a security team. Introduction of sigs provide a new construct for recognizing activity around a group that share interest around a topic or practice that are not mainly around software bits. Security is a great example of a topic that could benefit from this construct to gather all security-conscious people in our community. SIGs can have software by-products and own git repositories, and the software is more about security in general than a piece of OpenStack itself. It’s important to consider the Vulnerability Management Team (VMT) under the new model, which acts as an independent task force. The Security team discussed the idea of a SIG in their meeting, and overall think it’s worth exploring by having the SIG and team exist in parallel to see if there is traction. Full thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/thread.html#124053
Categories: Openstack Foundation

Developer Mailing List Digest October 21-27

Openstack Foundation Blog - Mon, 30/10/2017 - 21:53
News
  • TC election results [0]
  • Next PTG will be in Dublin, the week of February 26, 2018. More details will be posted on openstack.org/ptg as soon as we have them. [1]
[0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123845.html [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124021.html SuccessBot Says
  • gothamr_  [0]:changes to the manila driverfixes branches can finally be merged xD Thanks infra folks for ZuulV3!
  • andreaf [1]: Tempest test base class is now a stable API for plugins
  • More [2]
[0] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-manila/%23openstack-manila.2017-10-17.log.html [1] – http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-release/%23openstack-release.2017-10-24.log.html [2] – https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Successes Community Summaries
  • TC Report 43 by Chris Dent [0]
  • Nova Notification Update Week 43 by Balazs Gibizer [1]
  • POST /api-sig/news by Chris Dent [2]
  • Technical Committee Status Update by Thierry Carrez [3]
  • Nova Placements Resource Provider Update [4]
[0] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123944.html [1] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123990.html [2] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124023.html [3] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123818.html [4] – http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/124052.html Time to Remove the Ceilometer API? Summarized by Jeremy Stanley The Ceilometer REST API was deprecated in Ocata, a year ago, and the User Survey indicates more than half its users have switched to the non-OpenStack Gnocchi service’s API instead (using Ceilometer as a backend). The Ceilometer install guide has also been recommending Gnocchi at least as long ago as Newton. The old API has become an attractive nuisance from the Telemetry team’s perspective, and they’d like to go ahead and drop it altogether in Queens. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123593.html Keystone v2.0 API Removal Summarized by Thierry Carrez Keystone Queen’s PTL Lance Bragstad gives notice that the Queen’s release will not be included v2.0, except the ec2-api. This is being done after a lengthy given deprecation period. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-October/123783.html
Categories: Openstack Foundation
Subscribe to Stack Evolution aggregator - Openstack Foundation